All Things Microsoft > Microsoft Software
Microsoft claims firms 'hitting a wall' with Linux
dmcfarland:
And you thought the "how things work" article about microsoft was a pile of bullshit. Anyone got hipboots?
"Microsoft today released the findings of an independent report claiming that the Windows platform is "more consistent, predictable and easier to manage than Linux".
The study, commissioned by the software giant from Security Innovation, a provider of application security services, claimed that Linux administrators took 68 per cent longer to implement new business requirements than their Windows counterparts.
"As they attempt to increase business capabilities over time, customers are telling us that they are hitting a wall with Linux, experiencing significant reliability issues resulting in higher total cost of ownership," said Martin Taylor, general manager of platform strategy at Microsoft.
"This study shows that IT administrators are better able to maintain the system while delivering new capabilities predictably and consistently on the Windows platform.
"We invite other vendors, including Novell, IBM and Red Hat, to repeat their own independent analysis based on Security Innovation's methodology."
Security Innovation said that its study of the manageability differences between Windows and Linux attempted to simulate a "real-world" enterprise e-commerce environment over the course of a year.
The study compared two teams of experienced IT administrators running Windows Server 2000 and Novell SUSE Enterprise Linux 8, then monitored their progress as they upgraded to Windows Server 2003 and Novell SUSE Enterprise Linux 9.
According to the study the Windows platform was "more reliable as enterprise needs change over time". The Novell SLES solution experienced 14 critical breakages, while the Windows Server system experienced none, the report claimed.
Security Innovation also claimed that the Novell SLES infrastructure required 4.79 times the number of patches.
"Our research indicates that the primary methods of computing reliability as indicators of real IT pain are overly simplistic," said Herbert H. Thompson, chief security strategist at Security Innovation.
"For example, kernel uptime is commonly cited as a metric of overall platform reliability. However, the reliability of a single component, even one so central as the operating system kernel, is rarely the largest source of pain.
"Security Innovation designed this study to be repeatable, and we believe that the results are consistent with what customers are experiencing in the real world."
A PDF of the Security Innovation report is available here. "
Lead Head:
--- Quote from: Someone company that i dont care about --- Security Innovation also claimed that the Novell SLES infrastructure required 4.79 times the number of patches.
--- End quote ---
Thats because Novell found and fixed the problems, while MS has (possibly) found the problems, but are to lazy to make the patches!
cymon:
--- Quote ---As they attempt to increase business capabilities over time, customers are telling us that they are hitting a wall with Linux, experiencing significant reliability issues resulting in higher total cost of ownership," said Martin Taylor, general manager of platform strategy at Microsoft.
--- End quote ---
Wow, I never knew a kernel could be so hard to use.
Seriously though, it only takes four extra keystrokes to type GNU/Linux. Besides, people will think you're so much smarter.
Lead Head:
--- Quote from: dmcfarland ---"As they attempt to increase business capabilities over time, customers are telling us that they are hitting a wall with Linux, experiencing significant reliability issues resulting in higher total cost of ownership," said Martin Taylor, general manager of platform strategy at Microsoft.
--- End quote ---
Question, why would Microsoft customers, be using linux? Doesnt_make_sense_to_me
H_TeXMeX_H:
Kill :fu: Bill :mad: ... Gates that is :D
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
Go to full version