Operating Systems > macOS
About The Mac
WMD:
--- Quote from: Aloone_Jonez ---It's Darwine and it's an emulator and so it's very slow and it's not too good either. I haven't used it acctually but I know this as it's a WINE port to Mac and WINE isn't very good. Yes I do know that WINE isn't a hardware emulator for Linux (just Windows API) but the Mac's hardware is totally differant to the 86x hence Darwine is an emulator. If you like DOS games there's DOSBox for Mac but it's very very slow even slower than on than it is on the 86x (more hardware emulation is required) I've been told it's equivalent to a 486 (at best) on a brand new Mac!
--- End quote ---
I think he was talking about Virtual PC.
sjor:
On the Intel Macs, you will be able to install Windows as a secondary OS, so you won't actually need Virtual PC. Not that I'd want to...
Kintaro:
You should keep in mind that their are copies of OS/X for x86 floating around, even some with patched kernels that support SSE2 only processors. So if you really want to be sure before you shell out some coin on new hardware, it is worth trying.
Also I would like to point out that Apple have always in my experience made the most reliable desktop computer hardware available, and even if your not happy with OS/X you can always run Linux on your Mac anyway which is a bonus.
cymon:
--- Quote from: Aloone_Jonez ---It's Darwine and it's an emulator and so it's very slow and it's not too good either. I haven't used it acctually but I know this as it's a WINE port to Mac and WINE isn't very good. Yes I do know that WINE isn't a hardware emulator for Linux (just Windows API) but the Mac's hardware is totally differant to the 86x hence Darwine is an emulator. If you like DOS games there's DOSBox for Mac but it's very very slow even slower than on than it is on the 86x (more hardware emulation is required) I've been told it's equivalent to a 486 (at best) on a brand new Mac!
--- End quote ---
Sort of. Darwine is not an emulator, it is a translator for the Windows system calls. It contains the QEMU F/OSS x86 emulator, but that is just so it can use x86 instructions. I am a bit sad about the Intel Macs, it is my belief that the PowerPC architecture is far superior to the x86.
worker201:
--- Quote from: cymon ---I am a bit sad about the Intel Macs, it is my belief that the PowerPC architecture is far superior to the x86.
--- End quote ---
That might be true. But the way I heard it, Apple wasn't having their processor demands met. They needed fatter processors to go in the PowerBook, and IBM wasn't making one. And the G6 wasn't set to arrive on time.
Well, whatever. As long as Apple doesn't put any of that Celeron crippleware in the Macs, it'll be okay.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version