Operating Systems > Linux and UNIX

Linux vs Windows a real life comparison

<< < (5/30) > >>

toadlife:

--- Quote ---please elaborate and list all steps (or most) that may possibly make a Window$ machine even marginally more secure ... I don't believe it's possible, but I wanna hear what you have to say ...
--- End quote ---

I'd be happy to, but I have to give my son a bath and put him to bed. Tommorow. :)

MarathoN:

--- Quote from: toadlife ---Sorry to hear that. It doesn't for me.
--- End quote ---

Same for me, I've never had a crash, the only BSOD I have had was a driver issue, a simple re-install of the driver stopped that. :)

Aloone_Jonez:
Exactly, if you know what you're doing Windows can be quite satable - this is even more the case if you don't run anti-virus.

Master of Reality:

--- Quote from: dmcfarland ---Samba is faster than Windows Server 2003.:p
--- End quote ---

I dont see how you can say that with any credibility when you just admitted you had no idea what Microsoft Windows 2003 was, and assumed that it was Microsoft Windows XP.

piratePenguin:

--- Quote from: Aloone_Jonez ---Exactly, if you know what you're doing Windows can be quite satable
--- End quote ---
Also, refrain from right-clicking on any folders.

I used Windows for no more than half an hour one night and it fucking crashed when I right-clicked on a folder.
WHAT. THE. FUCK?

You'd almost think someone set that up, just to piss me off. But no, it's just Windows.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page