Operating Systems > Linux and UNIX
Emacs, or Vim?
WMD:
--- Quote from: Aloone_Jonez ---Like edlin which isn't included in MS-DOS 5 to Windows ME
--- End quote ---
Eh? I'm pretty sure it's there. I don't have any DOS 5.0 disks to check, but my manual for it describes Edlin in excruciating detail.
themacuser:
I was an emacs user, but I use vim now, or just TextEdit.
worker201:
--- Quote from: Calum ---actually (and i know this is pedantic) but vi isn't a command line text editor. ed is a command line text editor, however vi is a text based graphical text editor.
--- End quote ---
How about we just say "non-X editor"?
Aloone_Jonez:
--- Quote from: WMD ---Eh? I'm pretty sure it's there. I don't have any DOS 5.0 disks to check, but my manual for it describes Edlin in excruciating detail.
--- End quote ---
I'm sure it was missing in DOS 6, 6.22, on second thoughts I don't really know about Windows 9x I just assumed because it wasn't present in DOS 6.x it was absent in Win 9x.
cymon:
I just use nano, the only thing I really used it for was editing /etc/apt/sources.list on some ancient computer that couldn't even run xdm. Either that or editing .bash_profile to run DarwinPorts.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version