Stop Microsoft
Miscellaneous => Applications => Topic started by: HPC GUY on 21 April 2003, 23:06
-
dont know if its true but someone seems to think its so
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9056 (http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9056)
-
Wow! These are serious accusations! :eek: I don't mind since I never liked or used Opera, but Opera users should be more than worried!
-
hmm...i hope that isn't true--i love opera!! i just had my friend dl it for me, and i have it installed on every one of my computers. even if it is true, i'll probibly still use opera, at least in linux, because i like the browser so much. i'll just do everything that i need to be secure in Mozilla (online purchases, email with evolution, etc)
-
WOW! :eek: I'm glad I'm not using Opera! :D
[ April 21, 2003: Message edited by: The all Microsoft hater ]
-
Actually Opera isn't that bad. Anytime I'm on win2k and I need to do something that mozilla based browsers can't do, opera is pulled out as a last resort. Damn near anything IE can do, opera can do, only better and with much fewer bugs.
-
quote:
Originally posted by MisteR2:
Actually Opera isn't that bad. Anytime I'm on win2k and I need to do something that mozilla based browsers can't do, opera is pulled out as a last resort. Damn near anything IE can do, opera can do, only better and with much fewer bugs.
Erm, did you read that article? Sorry, but if this were true, then I wouldn't dare go anywhere near Opera, let alone use it! Use Mozilla! It is standards-compliants, propably the only browser that really is, and quite fast and stable! ;)
[ April 22, 2003: Message edited by: Panos ]
-
Those in the know use Moz
-
Opera sucks ass. You must really think people are stupid to pay for a browser. Now who does that apart from opera *cough* msn *cough*
-
Oh please, just another example of the stupidity of people not paying attention and reading licenses and copyright data.
Opera may or may not contain spyware, that is the risk of closed source software, but the function the idiot in that article is describing is not spyware it is adware, and Opera are perfectly clear about this. Clicking on ads will customize what ads you receive, you can even tell them what ads you want to receive by filling in the advertising section of their preferences. They have a privacy policy telling you what they will do with personal data, and they tell you they are going to collect it. If the guy in the article did not know this he did not read the agreements properly, and if he did not read the agreements he is stupid.
This information is stored and dealt with by a libary, hence it looks at that DLL file occasionally. There is nothing covert about this, you agreed to this when you installed the damn program and didn't buy the browser but chose to use it for free.
-
well, you get what you don't pay for i reckon, which is why i use mozilla, konqueror, phoenix and epiphany (all free and open source) for web browsing. no spyware, much better stability and security than any of your opera or IE rubbish.
-
hey, opera is stable, whether it's secure or not is in question...
-
quote:
Originally posted by Linux Frank:
Oh please, just another example of the stupidity of people not paying attention and reading licenses and copyright data.
Opera may or may not contain spyware, that is the risk of closed source software, but the function the idiot in that article is describing is not spyware it is adware, and Opera are perfectly clear about this. Clicking on ads will customize what ads you receive, you can even tell them what ads you want to receive by filling in the advertising section of their preferences. They have a privacy policy telling you what they will do with personal data, and they tell you they are going to collect it. If the guy in the article did not know this he did not read the agreements properly, and if he did not read the agreements he is stupid.
This information is stored and dealt with by a libary, hence it looks at that DLL file occasionally. There is nothing covert about this, you agreed to this when you installed the damn program and didn't buy the browser but chose to use it for free.
good point, of course people very rarely read the licensing agreement
-
Inquirers 'apology', funny in a way:
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9078 (http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9078)
Reader reactions:
http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9076 (http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9076)
Just goes to show dont always beleve what u read...on the net more so.
Pass the word that the inquirer is a rag ! ;)
:D
[ April 23, 2003: Message edited by: new2linux55 ]
-
didnt say i believed it, he just put a strong case behind his accusations
-
quote:
Originally posted by Linux User #5225982375:
Those in the know use Moz
..and any Gecko-based browser. ;)