Stop Microsoft

Operating Systems => Linux and UNIX => Topic started by: Siplus on 15 March 2003, 06:53

Title: BSD vs Linux
Post by: Siplus on 15 March 2003, 06:53

i'm going to just start by asking: what is the main differnce between the two?

i know bsd is older, it uses a different kernal, and i heard somewhere that networking in bsd is better then in linux. but bsd and linux are both unix based, so what can be all that different?

Title: BSD vs Linux
Post by: choasforages on 16 March 2003, 05:23

depends on style, like i am living without hardware exelerated gl becuase im using a -CURRENT *bsd, but it is far more solid then linux at some things. but linux has the hardware support for alot of odd things that *bsd doesn't. but im going back to linux and -STABLE once i get my new computer.

Title: BSD vs Linux
Post by: emh on 16 March 2003, 06:14

The way I understand it, BSD is more targeted toward those wanting to run servers, while Linux is more targeted at general computer use.

Title: BSD vs Linux
Post by: TheQuirk on 16 March 2003, 21:30

http://www.iqmedia.co.uk/images/bill%20gates.jpg (http://www.iqmedia.co.uk/images/bill%20gates.jpg) He's not fat.

Title: BSD vs Linux
Post by: cloudstrife on 17 March 2003, 08:49

im a bsd fanatic.  im also 130 pounds, 17 years old, 6'4" and skinny as a fuckin twig   ;)

Title: BSD vs Linux
Post by: Siplus on 18 March 2003, 05:28

uh, well this is an interesting thread : )

i downloaded FreeBSD, and i'm going to install it on my computer that has mandrake and redhat (and win2k, xp). i assume the directory structure is similar to linux. what filesystem does bsd use? will it install a bootloader?

Title: BSD vs Linux
Post by: TheQuirk on 19 March 2003, 04:57

Speaking in Steve Balmer, at one point in time, he used to scan porn and putting it on the Microsoft file server (this was in '95 or '97... hehehe).

Title: BSD vs Linux
Post by: untz on 19 March 2003, 08:17

I love FreeBSD, its all I use for both servers and my desktop.  The ports are great.  Just an FYI, the freebsd handbook is an excellent source of information.

http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html (http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/index.html)

Title: BSD vs Linux
Post by: choasforages on 19 March 2003, 08:49

yes, the handbook rules, not only do they give you one of the best operating systems out their, they give you a damned good book on how to put it to good use. and yes, the bsd directory layout is simalar to linux's, but it is more organized. also the ports system is wonderful, it's magic level is rated at "capible of alternate dimensionale black magic and beyound"  while choas himself is only rated at "black voodoo magic"/*compile XFree86, or the jdk by hand, then use the ports system to do it, you will painfully realize what im talking about :)*/ and the package system know's were to get crack from, it doesn't plague me about it dependancy's like another one does, *cough RPM cough* and it only install's a boot loader if you tell it to. and remember, it is way easyer to use /boot/loader as the kernel on a freebsd system then to try to get lilo or grub to directly boot the kernel. and grub treats /boot/loader like a kernel, so no chainloader magic needed. and the kernel is very easy to compile, read the handbook for that, and ask me some options to make things run a bit better. well have fun with *bsd, thats what its all about ya know

[ March 18, 2003: Message edited by: chaosforages ]