Stop Microsoft
Miscellaneous => The Lounge => Topic started by: skyman8081 on 14 July 2004, 07:07
-
(http://members.cox.net/dark_helmet/animaniacs-season-1-DVD--2.jpg)
A photoshop DVD cover I made.
-
Very nice! But you should chamge the colour of 'presents'.
-
that was how my original image was.
the promo poster for the series.
-
I miss that show. :(
-
I should have watched Animaniacs more often.
-
Are they really releasing a DVD, or did you just make a cover for fun?
I hope they are. I would buy it because of this thread.
-
I'd so get it
-
Dammit Sauron, I went looking after you posted that. Alas, nothing was to be found... :(
-
A slight problem with your DVD cover, Sauron: you made it fold on the right side instead of the left side.
-
fixed it.
huge problem, seeing as I am actually printing it.
-
You might want to put the lettering of 'presents' in white, rather than black. If you can.
-
...
http://www.artformsdesign.com/viewtopic.php?t=278 (http://www.artformsdesign.com/viewtopic.php?t=278)
Maybe post there as well, since that is where the challenge is?
-
That show owned...fuck WB for cancelling it.
-
quote:
Originally posted by Laukev7:
A slight problem with your DVD cover, Sauron: you made it fold on the right side instead of the left side.
Maybe he is moving to the Middle East!
-
That show had great toons. Pinky and the Brain. Slappy Squirril. Oh man Slappy was so funny.
-
NTSC sucks.
Anyway, yeah that show was fun. Not as fun as Eek! The Cat, Rocko's Modern Life, Cow & Chicken and Ren & Stimpy, but still awesome.
-
NTSC may suck (Never Twice the Same Color)
but, putting it in PAL or SECAM would render it unwatchable in North America, where NTSC is used.
and NTSC was around before SECAM and PAL anyway.
-
Isn't PAL only 25fps anyway? Everything would look like screen movies. The noticable difference between the two here is for a reason.
-
quote:
WMD: Isn't PAL only 25fps anyway? Everything would look like screen movies. The noticable difference between the two here is for a reason.
I have a VCR that has a switch for NTSC and PAL.
NTSC stores less data on your medium, but loses it's quality, while PAL stores more data, but has a fat superoir quality over NTSC. Anyone with a NTSC and PAL cabable VCR can test this for him/herself.
-
quote:
Originally posted by WMD:
Isn't PAL only 25fps anyway? Everything would look like screen movies. The noticable difference between the two here is for a reason.
PAL has more lines per frame so has better resolution/definiton. Your eye doesn't notice the lower fps. The formats only have different framerates because of the way they had to be implemented.