Stop Microsoft
Miscellaneous => The Lounge => Topic started by: Canadian Lover on 11 August 2004, 07:01
-
http://www.highiqsociety.org/noflash/nonmembers/iqtests.htm (http://www.highiqsociety.org/noflash/nonmembers/iqtests.htm)
[12:43]
Edited the original post for abuse towards a forum member. Sorry to say, Canadian Lover, but given your track record, you are not entitled to judge other people's mental level.
[ August 11, 2004: Message edited by: Laukev7 / BOB ]
-
i looked at that test real fast and it seems pretty good, ill take it later.
if you wanna see another iq test check this one out:web page (http://web.tickle.com/tests/superiq/authorize/signin.jsp?url=/tests/superiq/index.jsp) (i made a 133 on that one so it must not be very hard)
-
I did the culture fair test two year ago, and I got 146, and that was without taking my Ritalin.
Maybe if I take some medication I'll do better than last time. (http://smile.gif)
Not that I want to brag or anything. I also have a slew of neurological disabilities like ADHD, Asperger's Syndrome, and overall sluggishness.
[ August 10, 2004: Message edited by: Laukev7 / BOB ]
-
As a social worker I can guarantee these types of tests are crap.
-
True, they only measure mathematical processing, but don't take into account many other aspects of the brain like philosophical intelligence. Essentially, they show how many long series of calculations and extrapolations you can make, which are totally useless in real life. I think that for practical purposes, IQ differences are not very significant past a certain level.
Furthermore, they mean very little for people with disabilities such as myself. Nevertheless, it's still fun, for people with way too much time on their hands.
[ August 10, 2004: Message edited by: Laukev7 / BOB ]
-
They mean nothing.
A real IQ test ends at 140.
If you reach this number, you have to take an other test.
It also doesn't use any standards.
[ August 11, 2004: Message edited by: insomnia ]
-
Not that I care. Whatever my IQ really is (and I doubt there is such a thing), I still fail my exams because I am too slow and disorganised. :(
[ August 11, 2004: Message edited by: Laukev7 / BOB ]
-
I
-
quote:
Originally posted by Canadian Lover:
http://www.highiqsociety.org/noflash/nonmembers/iqtests.htm (http://www.highiqsociety.org/noflash/nonmembers/iqtests.htm)
And I believe solaris' score will be something below 100 (average)
Hey, what's wrong with people who have an IQ below 100? (http://tongue.gif)
I had an IQ test when I was seven. I didn't really pay any attention to it :D
-
quote:
Originally posted by Refalm / BOB:
I had an IQ test when I was seven.
so that's what that test they made me take when i was a kid was. DAMNIT! no wonder they look at me like i'm an idiot now. i blew it 11 years ago! and i thought it was me continously doing something wrong.
-
quote:
Originally posted by Commander - useSuse:
so that's what that test they made me take when i was a kid was. DAMNIT! no wonder they look at me like i'm an idiot now. i blew it 11 years ago! and i thought it was me continously doing something wrong.
Today, we use completely different tests.
Try a new one(this shoudn't only include IQ). ;)
[ August 11, 2004: Message edited by: insomnia ]
-
I went through a real test this summer (not just IQ). It was very expensive ($1500 CAD), but worth it.
[ August 11, 2004: Message edited by: Laukev7 / BOB ]
-
quote:
Originally posted by Laukev7 / BOB:
I went through a real test this summer (not just IQ). It was very expensive ($1500 CAD), but worth it.
Over here that's free, like it should.
-
It was a test at a private institution. I could have gotten one for free (we do after all have universal medical care), but I would have needed to wait longer. My parents thought that the $1500 was worth the short time. I think their insurance covers part of it.
I wouldn't have minded to wait, but since I'm a student, I needed to get the results so I could know how to organise and cope with my special needs.
[ August 11, 2004: Message edited by: Laukev7 / BOB ]
-
quote:
Originally posted by Laukev7 / BOB:
I wouldn't have minded to wait, but since I'm a student, I needed to get the results so I could know how to organise and cope with my special needs.
[ August 11, 2004: Message edited by: Laukev7 / BOB ]
I think that's sad.
Those results really mean nothing.
Since I helped building these tests, I know how they work.
They simply fail.
Most people who take these tests hope to score 140+.
They're all wrong.
These tests are only intended to show your best qualities.
[ August 11, 2004: Message edited by: insomnia ]
-
I'm not sure if we understand each other. What I took was not an intelligence test; I took that test because I needed a proper diagnosis of my learning disabilities. The IQ was only one small part of it, And yes, it did show my best qualities (arithmetics and languages) and pointed out the shortcomings that slowed me down. One of the tests involved naming a series of colours, numbers and pictures as fast as possible, where I scored amongst the poorest of the population (3rd-7th centile or something). I've also been found to be highly impulsive. You know, that sort of stuff.
From your description, what I took was exactly one of the sort of tests you were talking about. At least I hope. I'm really not as concerned with my IQ as with what kept me from performing well despite it. Because of that, I'm going to have to switch to social science (temporarily), the time to readjust and learn how to work properly with my non-standard abilities, before going back to my pure and applied science programme.
Fuck it, I'm all confused. The whole school system is crap anyway.
Oh, and YAY! My 2100th post!
[ August 12, 2004: Message edited by: Laukev7 / BOB ]