Stop Microsoft

Miscellaneous => The Lounge => Topic started by: Calum on 29 December 2002, 04:07

Title: My signature images
Post by: Calum on 29 December 2002, 04:07
hello, my signature images look fine in a 1024 px monitor but look shit in a smaller monitor. should i remove one of the images to make it look okay on an 800 px monitor too? if so which one? or should i just make the images a bit skinnier?
Title: My signature images
Post by: choasforages on 29 December 2002, 04:09
looks great at 1600x1200
unfourtannly nothing supports 800x600, only 1024x768 1600x1200 or 640x480
Title: My signature images
Post by: Calum on 29 December 2002, 04:36
well i bet it looks shit at 640 as well. hang on... yes it is almost as bad unsurprisingly. what pleasantly surprises me is that it doesn't look that shit in only 8 bit colour!

[ December 28, 2002: Message edited by: Calum ]

Title: My signature images
Post by: Master of Reality on 29 December 2002, 05:03
just take out the free mp3 or integrational polytheism (its just as plain as text anyway)
Title: My signature images
Post by: trc3 on 29 December 2002, 05:19
I say just size them down a little, while on the subject, MOR your sig could also use a little bit of a down size.
Title: My signature images
Post by: Master of Reality on 29 December 2002, 06:59
*grrrr*
Title: My signature images
Post by: Calum on 29 December 2002, 18:40
quote:
Originally posted by trc3:
I say just size them down a little, while on the subject, MOR your sig could also use a little bit of a down size.
i second that.
Title: My signature images
Post by: Master of Reality on 29 December 2002, 21:37
teh area of your images is bigger (or extremely close) than the area of my one image.

[ December 29, 2002: Message edited by: The Master of Reality / B0b ]

Title: My signature images
Post by: Calum on 29 December 2002, 21:47
since we're straining gnats, your images are all on top of one another and they suck!   (http://smile.gif)  

ps, i will need to wait a few days to resize my images, while i am at the buddhist college here* they only have win98 MSPAINT and it doesn't do jpegs (duh!)

(* If you need to ask, it's too long to explain)

[ December 29, 2002: Message edited by: Calum ]

Title: My signature images
Post by: Master of Reality on 29 December 2002, 22:33
ummm... i only have one image in my sig.

[ December 29, 2002: Message edited by: The Master of Reality / B0b ]

Title: My signature images
Post by: Master of Reality on 29 December 2002, 22:41
how now?

[ December 29, 2002: Message edited by: The Master of Reality / B0b ]

Title: My signature images
Post by: Calum on 30 December 2002, 00:56
much nicer, and sorry, the other four ugly non loading images i see aren't images at all. i had assumed there was some problem on my end, but no, it's just redundant img tags in your signature designed, no doubt, to clock up your score somewhere on some site.
Title: My signature images
Post by: rtgwbmsr on 30 December 2002, 01:04
Scratch that...it is now.

[ December 29, 2002: Message edited by: The Muffin Man ]

Title: My signature images
Post by: Calum on 30 December 2002, 01:21
what is????   :confused:    :confused:    :confused:    :confused:    :confused:  

and i squished my IP image so now it fits on an 800 px screen.
Title: My signature images
Post by: rtgwbmsr on 30 December 2002, 01:34
It's about MOR's. It doesn't load properly until I reload...
Title: My signature images
Post by: Master of Reality on 30 December 2002, 02:27
dammit, i cant please any of you.... i'll fix it.

[ December 29, 2002: Message edited by: The Master of Reality / Bob ]

Title: My signature images
Post by: solo on 30 December 2002, 03:36
i quote dubya in my sig, but i like to type FUCK MICROSOFT at the end of all my posts.

FUCK MICROSOFT. And yes, it's personal.
Title: My signature images
Post by: Calum on 30 December 2002, 04:24
'is our children learning?'

there are so many dubya quotes, it would be nice if you could have a different one in every signature! he has certainly said enough dumb things!

ps: and re: MoR's signature - i reloaded, it still sucks.  :D

[ December 29, 2002: Message edited by: Calum ]