Stop Microsoft

Miscellaneous => The Lounge => Topic started by: skyman8081 on 24 August 2005, 21:08

Title: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: skyman8081 on 24 August 2005, 21:08
A listing of all the worlds aircraft carriers (http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/world/carriers.htm)

The US is the only country on earth that can project force anywhere in the world.  Booya!

*plays the imperial march*
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: Lead Head on 24 August 2005, 21:37
god we have alot of carriers
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: skyman8081 on 24 August 2005, 21:41
The US can defend its coastline from 13-14 enemy nations, At ONCE!
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: Kintaro on 24 August 2005, 21:41
The US is also the only country in the world stupid enough to vote in a dictator.
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: Jenda on 24 August 2005, 21:41
And the Jedi. Oh, on Earth. Hell, who cares about Earth...
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: Kintaro on 24 August 2005, 21:43
Quote from: skyman8081
The US can defend its coastline from 13-14 enemy nations, At ONCE!

It has the equipment, but its hardly capable. Your nation can barely fight a pissy insurgency.
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: skyman8081 on 24 August 2005, 21:45
Quote from: kintaro
It has the equipment, but its hardly capable. Your nation can barely fight a pissy insurgency.

 They can't use a rocket launch fer shit though.
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: Kintaro on 24 August 2005, 21:50
Yeah, but they arn't hooped up on Amphetamines (go-pills) and Stillnox (no go pills) so they don't experience psychosis and kill a bunch of friendlies. Your countrys military in full operation would just kill itself off before it got 25% of what other nations have.

Both those medications can cause hallucinations, and mixed only hours (even 24 hours) apart they can cause serious cases of psychosis. I am living proof of this.
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: Kintaro on 24 August 2005, 22:16
Not to mention those big barsted Aircraft Carriers need OIL. You would have to cut off people with cars to pull off an operation that big, hence nobody will like it and such a war would end quickly.
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: skyman8081 on 24 August 2005, 22:21
They run on nuclear reactors.

Not Oil.
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: Lead Head on 24 August 2005, 22:45
go FISSION
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: Kintaro on 24 August 2005, 22:51
Haha, now I really do sound like an idiot.

Either way, the Aircraft need Oil. They don't do much without aircraft. The fuel of cruise missiles needs oil. Sure, you can run around on your nuculear fission all you wan't, but it still needs other things.

Read this: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/21/magazine/21OIL.html?pagewanted=1&th&emc=th
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: Jenda on 24 August 2005, 23:31
How'bout nuclear aircraft :)
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: Kintaro on 24 August 2005, 23:36
Yeah, all that weight, AND GET IT TO FLY. Not to mention what happens when one crashes. How about we run the software on them with Linux ac patched kernel's as well?

Hrm. I am getting to worked up.
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: Stilly on 25 August 2005, 05:21
kintaro has a case of carrier envy
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: skyman8081 on 25 August 2005, 06:08
Quote from: Stilly
kintaro has a case of carrier envy
e-Penis++
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: solemnwarning on 25 August 2005, 06:27
Quote from: kintaro
Yeah, all that weight, AND GET IT TO FLY. Not to mention what happens when one crashes. How about we run the software on them with Linux ac patched kernel's as well?

Hrm. I am getting to worked up.

Since gov it would probably be running Windows :scared:

i dont want nuclueor powerd planes running Windows ME and MS-BOB anywhere near me! :nothappy::scared::eek:

btw i think i did bad spelling, its 05:31 here
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: Kintaro on 25 August 2005, 09:50
Quote from: Stilly
kintaro has a case of carrier envy

No. I envy skyman for that girl in his sig.
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: worker201 on 25 August 2005, 23:19
He envies you for the girl(s) in your sig.
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: skyman8081 on 25 August 2005, 23:25
Um... No.

They're 14.  That's just wrong.
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: Kintaro on 26 August 2005, 06:03
I just checked your profile, your the same age as me. WHATS WRONG WITH THAT.
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: Jenda on 26 August 2005, 20:23
14 is a little too young.
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: worker201 on 26 August 2005, 21:18
For a guy who's 32 like me, yes, 14 is waaaay too young.  But for a 17-year-old, 14 is prime.  Probably illegal in some areas, but prime nonetheless.  Freshman girls + senior boys = tradition older than America.
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: KernelPanic on 26 August 2005, 21:29
Quote from: worker201
Freshman girls + senior boys = tradition older than America.



and I thought Americans had ambition...
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: worker201 on 26 August 2005, 21:57
Right - dating up for girls is ambition for popularity.  Dating down for boys is ambition for easy sex.
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: Jenda on 26 August 2005, 22:59
Hmmm. Seems too young to me (18). Easy sex? I'll bet it's not as good as hard earned.
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: worker201 on 27 August 2005, 01:05
If there's grass on the field, play ball. :O
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: Annorax on 27 August 2005, 03:48
Quote from: worker201
If there's grass on the field, play ball. :O


Lol.
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: Pathos on 27 August 2005, 05:56
Aircraft carriers are useless against a nation with ICBM's + nuclear warheads.

America only has them to beat up the little guys.
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: Kintaro on 27 August 2005, 08:12
Quote from: worker201
If there's grass on the field, play ball. :O

I can honestly assure you (and provide you with evidence over ssh if you wish, that there is little grass on these particular fields.
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: worker201 on 29 August 2005, 01:30
Quote from: kintaro
I can honestly assure you (and provide you with evidence over ssh if you wish, that there is little grass on these particular fields.


Rather not, thanks.
Title: Re: The Worlds Aircraft Carriers
Post by: TheQuirk on 29 August 2005, 03:55
If there's no grass on the field, play in the mud.

Oi oi oi. :(