Stop Microsoft

Miscellaneous => The Lounge => Topic started by: Kintaro on 31 August 2005, 03:10

Title: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Kintaro on 31 August 2005, 03:10
Is when you get the wrong language.

http://kintaro.noobify.com/drupal/pub/images/Screenshots/Windows%20XP%20Eurotrash%20Edition/Installer.png
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Lead Head on 31 August 2005, 03:20
ouch, cant you switch it once you get into windows?
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: hm_murdock on 31 August 2005, 03:43
Lol
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Laukev7 on 31 August 2005, 04:35
Once I downloaded Windows NT to try it out, and I got it in Korean.
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Kintaro on 31 August 2005, 09:50
Haha.

Last year at school at the end of the year me and one of the teachers installed the Japanese version on computers belonging to the Administrators.
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: worker201 on 31 August 2005, 23:53
You don't speak Portugeuse?
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Kintaro on 1 September 2005, 11:49
I don't even know what the hell it is, I just called it "Eurotrash" for my own goods and purposes (as you can see with the name of the directory the image resides in).
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Jack2000 on 2 September 2005, 14:05
Try installing win98 cyrillic or some other 'foren' lang
to an old dos with out a cyrillization and watch the fun

 (http://home.unilang.org/main/softwareman/msjapanese.jpg)
like this one ^^^ ...woops clicked the chinese
by an err :] :) buhauhauahauaaaaa
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Kintaro on 2 September 2005, 20:29
I wont be suprised at all if Microsoft make there own standard of the English language and find a way to enforce it on everyone.
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: MarathoN on 2 September 2005, 23:05
Yeah, neither would I. :(
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Orethrius on 2 September 2005, 23:22
Quote from: kintaro
I wont be suprised at all if Microsoft make there own standard of the English language and find a way to enforce it on everyone.

 You though AOLspeek was bad?  Just wait for MSspeek.  
It's a cross between 1337, textspeak, and random marketing terminology thrown in to confuse the hell out of you.
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: MarathoN on 2 September 2005, 23:30
Seems like a totally pointless form of language to me.
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: worker201 on 3 September 2005, 00:20
Polychromate X0rZ outside the box.

That's MSspeek for "It's about 93 degrees Fahrenheit".
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: MarathoN on 3 September 2005, 00:43
jesus, that's complicated. ;)
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: WMD on 3 September 2005, 02:49
I downloaded a German version of DOS 6.22 once.
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Kintaro on 3 September 2005, 06:48
Lololololololololol
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Pathos on 6 September 2005, 14:35
piracy is illegal and you shouldn't do it. please stop.
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: MarathoN on 6 September 2005, 16:01
I don't do it anyway. ;)
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Orethrius on 6 September 2005, 16:27
Quote from: Pathos
piracy is illegal and you shouldn't do it. please stop.
That's right, keep talking.  Nevermind those Metallica MP3s. :p
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Jack2000 on 6 September 2005, 16:55
I'll say...



Never mind the rammstein album :)


(the only way to listen to hardcore-metal groups in bulgaria  is piracy)
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Jenda on 6 September 2005, 18:15
Quote from: Jack2000
I'll say...



Never mind the rammstein album :)


(the only way to listen to hardcore-metal groups in bulgaria  is piracy)

 Are they banned?

Your sig seems familiar!
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Jack2000 on 6 September 2005, 23:05
no but as soon as they get out on the shelves people buy them out ,
very fast :) my sig is going to change soon i am searching for
 dynamicly generated sigs
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Jenda on 7 September 2005, 18:27
I like this one: "Criticalerror: not enough M$ trash on YourComputer"
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Jack2000 on 7 September 2005, 21:42
:] i like it too
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Lead Head on 7 September 2005, 22:03
these sigs rule!
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: MarathoN on 7 September 2005, 22:55
Haha, I like your one Lead Head.

"Slackware is the choice for you!"

You know me so well. :D:D:D
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Lead Head on 7 September 2005, 22:59
it also says, your 3.73GHz CPU is not fast enough for windows, i might change it to windows vista :D
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: MarathoN on 7 September 2005, 23:12
Haha, I haven't seen/noticed that one yet. ;)
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Jenda on 8 September 2005, 18:42
I just saw the "Your 300GB HD isn't big enough for Win" one.
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Jenda on 8 September 2005, 18:44
I had several reactions already to "chances are that your OS sucks". Most were offended, cuz theirs doesn't, but after I pointed out that the statistics indeed imply that the chances ARE that their OS sucks, they mostly agreed.
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Pathos on 21 September 2005, 03:46
Quote from: Orethrius
That's right, keep talking.  Nevermind those Metallica MP3s. :p

I don't have any illegal data on my pc. Don't care much for metallica either.
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: adiment on 21 September 2005, 03:59
Quote from: Pathos
I don't have any illegal data on my pc. Don't care much for metallica either.

me neither. also, metallica rawks. :p
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Kintaro on 21 September 2005, 05:06
Metallica fucking suck. Listen to a real heavy band like Dream Theater, who kick Metallica's arse in every way possible.
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: worker201 on 21 September 2005, 19:24
Dream Theater - a bunch of music school pansies

Fuck all heavy metal
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Kintaro on 22 September 2005, 04:10
Wow, you really are a pussy.
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Refalm on 22 September 2005, 12:58
I fucking hate Dream Theater!
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Kintaro on 22 September 2005, 14:26
You're fired.
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Refalm on 22 September 2005, 14:41
The Foo Fighters suck too.
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Kintaro on 22 September 2005, 16:27
Argh, your a looser.
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Pathos on 23 September 2005, 01:31
Pink Floyd would kick their ass.
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: adiment on 23 September 2005, 03:15
Quote from: Pathos
Pink Floyd would kick their ass.

quoted for truth.
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: WMD on 23 September 2005, 04:04
Quote from: Pathos
Pink Floyd would kick their ass.

Pink Floyd kicks everyone's asses.  Except during "The Roger Waters Self-Masturbation Album," which most people call "The Final Cut."  Then, they only kick most people's asses.
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: worker201 on 23 September 2005, 05:15
Quote from: Pathos
Pink Floyd would kick their ass.


Quoted for clicheness.  Pink Floyd were talented and creative, but not uber-awesome.  Jimi Hendrix, Sonic Youth, Clash, Public Enemy, Pixies - now those are some fucking uber-awesome bands.
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: WMD on 23 September 2005, 05:21
Quote from: worker201
Pink Floyd were talented and creative, but not uber-awesome.

YOU TAKE THAT BACK
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: worker201 on 23 September 2005, 06:14
Pink Floyd is great compared to shitty bands like Led Zeppelin and the Backstreet Boys.
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Pathos on 23 September 2005, 10:32
...the clash better than pink floyd?????
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Kintaro on 23 September 2005, 14:55
Pink Floyd are fucking raaaaaaaaaaaaad.

I might go listen to The Wall.
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: worker201 on 24 September 2005, 05:28
Quote from: Pathos
...the clash better than pink floyd?????


Oh yes.  No question.
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: Kintaro on 24 September 2005, 18:43
Quote from: worker201
Oh yes.  No question.


What are you, Jewish?

PUT HIM UP AGAINST THE WALL!
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: worker201 on 25 September 2005, 02:15
What does Judaism have to do with it?  I find Pink Floyd to be boring, and I think that "London Calling" is still one of the most avant garde albums.  The Clash were light years ahead of anyone, even bands that are active now.  Maybe by 2020 pop music will catch up to The Clash.  Most all of Pink Floyd's contributions were outdone within a couple years, and completely eclipsed by a number of indy rock bands in the mid-90s.
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: WMD on 25 September 2005, 03:25
Quote from: worker201
What does Judaism have to do with it?

Pink Floyd: The Wall, side 4. "In the Flesh".  Give it a listen and you'll understand.
Title: Re: The downside of Piracy
Post by: MarathoN on 25 September 2005, 03:43
Quote from: worker201
What does Judaism have to do with it? I find Pink Floyd to be boring, and I think that "London Calling" is still one of the most avant garde albums. The Clash were light years ahead of anyone, even bands that are active now. Maybe by 2020 pop music will catch up to The Clash. Most all of Pink Floyd's contributions were outdone within a couple years, and completely eclipsed by a number of indy rock bands in the mid-90s.

I totally agree with you, I listen to The Clash myself. :thumbup: