Stop Microsoft

Miscellaneous => The Lounge => Topic started by: noob on 14 November 2005, 18:28

Title: Gates WARNING:LARGE IMAGE, VERY LARGE IMAGE. SO LARGE YOU WON'T BELIEVE IT IS POSSIBL
Post by: noob on 14 November 2005, 18:28
My little "modification" to bigg hates(that name was just a miss type, but i thought i'd leave it there).
Damn, the file was too large. I'll get it hosted somwhere. Gimme a bit to sort it.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Laukev7 on 14 November 2005, 18:46
http://www.illhostit.com/
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Jack2000 on 14 November 2005, 19:00
what the   ?
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: noob on 14 November 2005, 19:20
thanks for the illhostit link. i have an account there actually, enevr use it tho.

http://illhostit.com/gallery.php?gallery=7253258625122223 (http://illhostit.com/gallery.php?gallery=7253258625122223)

MY gallery there, ill put all my stupid images there.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Refalm on 14 November 2005, 19:21
From my personal experience, I'd recommend Ill Host It (http://www.illhostit.com/).

It's the absolute best in webhosting!
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Jack2000 on 14 November 2005, 19:24
hehe
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Laukev7 on 14 November 2005, 19:27
By the way, noob, Illhostit has a thumbnail feature. Please use it.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: skyman8081 on 15 November 2005, 02:08
Wow.  You are terrible at Photoshop.  Please do not torture us with your articstic abortions anymore.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Refalm on 15 November 2005, 08:59
Quote from: skyman8081
Wow.  You are terrible at Photoshop.  Please do not torture us with your articstic abortions anymore.

:D
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: themacuser on 15 November 2005, 12:13
Funny, but awesomely fake.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Dark_Me on 15 November 2005, 12:48
Quote from: skyman8081
Wow.  You are terrible at Photoshop.  Please do not torture us with your articstic abortions anymore.
Art has a point, a message. Hence this is not art. I will agree on it's quality though.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: H_TeXMeX_H on 16 November 2005, 01:31
Photoshop sux ... use the gimp (http://www.gimp.org/) :D
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Dark_Me on 16 November 2005, 05:34
Whats wrong with Photoshop? It was origanly for Macs but since it was so good they ported it over to Windows.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: skyman8081 on 16 November 2005, 06:30
Quote from: H_TeXMeX_H
Photoshop sux ... use the gimp (http://www.gimp.org/) :D
You're funny.

You do realise that The GIMP is an absolute BITCH to work with, right?

It's only for FSF blow-hards who think that looking at a peice of non-free software will cause it to anally violate them.  Any graphics person worth a damn uses Photoshop.  GIMP can compete with PS-wannabe's, like Paint.Net, MGI Photosuite, Paintshop pro.  Programs that SUCK.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Kintaro on 16 November 2005, 07:24
GIMP is good, when you learn to use it. Photoshop however has far more features.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: MarathoN on 17 November 2005, 00:39
Quote from: kintaro
GIMP is good, when you learn to use it. Photoshop however has far more features.

I agree, I've been using The GIMP for a fair while, and it is really nice to work with once you learn how to do a certain amount of stuff. :)
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: H_TeXMeX_H on 17 November 2005, 04:16
Quote from: skyman8081
You're funny.

You do realise that The GIMP is an absolute BITCH to work with, right?

It's only for FSF blow-hards who think that looking at a peice of non-free software will cause it to anally violate them. Any graphics person worth a damn uses Photoshop. GIMP can compete with PS-wannabe's, like Paint.Net, MGI Photosuite, Paintshop pro. Programs that SUCK.

It works great for me ... maybe it's because I never ask too much from either program ?
I suppose for "advanced" editing, Photoshop is a better choice.
I never liked Photoshop, in fact, I found several free programs that did what PS did better (better filters and color, brightness, contrast adjustment) ... back when I was still running Window$
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: worker201 on 17 November 2005, 05:22
While Photoshop is pretty damn neat sometimes, I don't think it is geometrically better than any other graphics program.  It's geometrically more "full" than other programs, but as far as interface and simplicity go, it's only arithmetically better than the others.

Thus, the choices.  If you use every filter every week and try every setting, then you are probably a professional photo-manipulator.  You need Photoshop.  For every other user, price and familiarity will be the main factors.  Even MsPaint can make you a "Save your drama for your llama" banner.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Dark_Me on 17 November 2005, 05:49
You can also use Photoshop for art. Take a look around DevientArt. Most of the cell style animation (think anime) is done in Photoshop.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: noob on 17 November 2005, 09:51
I'm allways on DA looking for stuff. It's amazing what can be don with Photoshop and a graphics pad.
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: Orethrius on 18 November 2005, 23:46
Quote from: skyman8081
You're funny.

You do realise that The GIMP is an absolute BITCH to work with, right?

It's only for FSF blow-hards who think that looking at a peice of non-free software will cause it to anally violate them. Any graphics person worth a damn uses Photoshop. GIMP can compete with PS-wannabe's, like Paint.Net, MGI Photosuite, Paintshop pro. Programs that SUCK.

'Tis a poor artist that blames his tools.  *zen*
Title: Re: Gates
Post by: themacuser on 19 November 2005, 07:02
Yeah, GIMP is not quite there yet. I still use photoshop.