its has started

[choasforages]

heheheheh, no oppresive regime started that way, it was always gradually increased, alot of times aimed at the childrem http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A8016-2002Dec4.html
hmmm, restrict  what the children can see. stop wasting my tax dallors/*and my dads*/. how about make people be better parants, my dad never let me have unmonitered access untill i was like 13/*yeah, any parent knows after that age, there is no way of blocking inappropriat material, hell, you are probably more worried about inappropriate relationships then p0rn*/. but no, they will bullshit its effectivenis, and gradually make domains for everything. like .news.us or .politics.us and turn it into the sole source of info for america, claim its easyness, herd the sheep into their power. becuase the children that are forced through  this will see no problem with it in later life. and be more infleunced by censor ship.

heheh, i even showed my dad the article, the response was something like "in a few years we will all be goosesstepping around the place"

targeting the children, who decids what is appropriate or not??? the governemtn does!
if im not mistaken a certian german dictator started with the children....

[ December 06, 2002: Message edited by: The Master of Reality / B0B ]

[TheQuirk]

I can't wait for www.goatse.kids (I know it doesn't sound like "goat sex" anymore, but it's the idea that counts. . !)

[slave]

Ah yes, but it does have the word "kid" in it.  Baaa!

[TheQuirk]

Oh yes. I wonder if they'll let me register ihate.kids?

[Master of Reality]

quote:Originally posted by TheQuirk:
Oh yes. I wonder if they'll let me register ihate.kids?

not if i get to it first

[TheQuirk]

quote:Originally posted by The Master of Reality / B0B:
not if i get to it first

I'll get it first.

I used to be friends with a guy whose aunt owned "saraff solutions": the same company who's going to develop the system to register those domains, or something like that. He told me about the domain about a year ago.

[choasforages]

?
i havn't seen anybody talking about some of the problems with such a solution and not better parenting./*or am i really kirking out, i have been feeling pretty fucking good over the past few days.... no drugz included, after a few weeks of feeling utter shit*/

[Pissed_Macman]

This sounds like a pretty good idea to me, as long as Microsoft stays out of it. Hehe, wouldn't it be funny if someone hacked into the kids' internet and put up porn and stuff?

[choasforages]

its the censor ship issue that has me agianst it. i do agree, that little kids have no need to be looking at porn, hell most adults don't need to look at that stuff/*choas is trying to break the porn habit, its not a good thing, and im not going  to mention anymore in a public forum*/. but our country needs to get things straight. which one would you think to be worse

movie''s containg consenting adults giving each other orgasm's

video games depicting lots  of violence
---------------------------------------------------------------
adults giving each other orgasms, now some porn is evil, but for the most part, alot is justpeople posing, the long term problem with that is people view others as objects for their own gratificaiton

video games at a young age when its harder to distinguse from reality isn't good, but at an older age, they can be very fun, and actally relieve stress/
-----------------------------------------------------------------
i would have to say, be a better parent. but that wount happen, god is in the tv, and the parents need to go get drunk and shit, so its always somebody elses responsibilty to watch them.

amd before somebody mentions that video games make people go nuts and kill others, it isn't true. if you are attracted to such things deeply. then you have problems that run far deeper then a shallow video game.


now back on my censor ship rant.  maybe this is a great initive in disguise, like xpuser. for it is said /*got it from the fortune file, its gotta be in a more "respectible" place though*/ that to make the brightest nation, simply ban education, and in 5 years we will have the most inteligent nation in the world. but i highly doubt that theory. too many sheeple, too much power to gained by he who controlls it all

[Pissed_Macman]

Porn is pretty stupid, but I still think it would be funny to cause children mental problems with it.

[TheQuirk]

quote:Originally posted by Macman: Mac Zealot / bOb:
Porn is pretty stupid, but I still think it would be funny to cause children mental problems with it.

Mommy, the man in the movie said it's a "pussy!" Why doesn't it meow?

[LorKorub]

I don't see why it is such a bad idea.  I don't think it really has anything to do with censourship, but for more of creating an appropriate environment for childern.  This will probably turn into more of a rating-system type deal than it would be a censourship thing.  Just like the movies, video games and everything else.  A .kids.us extension to parents, would just be like a PG or G movie rating  deal, or an E or T video game deal.  

You guys are just reading too much into it.

[Calum]

i agree to a point, it's a good idea, but should be closely mediated so it doesn't turn into just another restriction on free expression.