My god (pun intended), that's a lot of replies to answer to.
quote:
Up until recently Newtons theories of gravitation were believed to be absolute
Well, as you said, scientists know better today.
quote:
Then there *are* no hypothes' (stupid plurals...) by this definition then, for it is impossible to prove something absolutely.
This is why I said 'beyond reasonable doubt'. As in 'agreed upon, taking into account the knowledge at present', without necessarily being absolutely right. By defition, a theory can be falsified (I don't remember who said that, and I can't be bothered to open my school manuals to look this up). A hypothesis is a abstract of a theory, or, in other words, a lead to follow.
quote:
And there WERE experiments carried out - people burned stuff and hey it got lighter! (these were experiments performed and _believed_ by accepted scientists.) so OBVIOUSLY something had to be leaving the substance, and that something had to be phlogiston - you could even see it in the form of flames.
Obviously, and as you should know, this experiment has been misconducted, and the conclusion clearly begs the question. Again, scientific rigour has evolved since then.
quote:
A good scientist will *never* believe in an absolute truth, because there are too many examples of what eventually happens to a "proof" later on down the line.
I know that. But the layman is a different story.
quote:
Yes - there are severe logic errors in any claim that God is a)perfect and b)wants you to believe. But it is only if you try and claim the last two that you fuck up, not by claiming the existence of God.
Again, it depends on what you believe. What I said above debunks most religions, but does not imply that God does not exist in an other form -- even if 'His' only role was to make the Big Bang happen.
quote:
One WHOLE english lesson? Holy shit! Like a whole 40 minutes? Wow...
Sorry, I meant a semester.