Calum,
I've just read some of the recent posts in the forum, and I agree with you, if someone badmouths you and you defend your self your responses should under no circumstances be deleted unless the bitch posts are deleted to. This is fucking disgusting flaming is unacceptable and now it is also unacceptable to defend your self this just takes the piss!
How about an example (and I think I know which one you'd pick but heh)?
:fu: Moderators who censor free speech and defensive posts!
Have you ever looked at Freenet? Where censorship
does not exist and everything is (can be) anonymous. Where free speech overrules
everything else, even when the networks future is under attack because fucktards are using it for pedophilia and such evil shit.
I thought it was a great idea, and it is. But it's exploited by evil shitheads far too much.
As such, I think at least a wee-bit of censorship wouldn't go to far astray.
I can kinda guess that you probably didn't mean ":fu: Moderators who censor free speech and defensive posts!" and probably meant something along these lines:
":fu: Moderators who censor
whenever they should not!".
That's an assumption and I might be wrong, but in any case...
:fu: Moderators who censor whenever they should not!
And by that I mean, if a moderator censors when he/she shouldn't have, he/she may get a nice little :fu:
I don't mean :fu: Moderaters in general because some moderator might censor when he/she shouldn't have.
(Jeenie mack, I officially hate English. That sentance should be read straight through, fast.)
Anyhow, Aloone, check out Freenet if ya want (or haven't already done so), and it's fucking amazing philosophy.
http://freenetproject.org
