Poll

Emacs or Vim

Emacs
11 (37.9%)
Vim
11 (37.9%)
DOS edit
1 (3.4%)
other
6 (20.7%)

Total Members Voted: 27

« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Emacs, or Vim?  (Read 6892 times)

ReggieMicheals

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 186
  • Kudos: 228
    • http://osadvocacy.frih.net/
Emacs, or Vim?
« on: 16 December 2005, 02:06 »
I'm Emacs all the way...
Logged
Operating System Advocacy. I've given up on the Microsuck project, as well as any of the minisite spinoffs. You can still view the new beta site, though!

piratePenguin

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 3,027
  • Kudos: 775
    • http://piratepenguin.is-a-geek.com/~declan/
Re: Emacs, or Vim?
« Reply #1 on: 16 December 2005, 02:11 »
Quote from: ReggieMicheals
I'm Emacs all the way...
w00t!

I predict vim will win the poll (EDIT: whoops, I thought it was just vim and emacs.), it seems to be more popular.
I used to use it all the time (with a bit of gedit and KDevelop.), but then I took the time to learn Emacs and I love it. I still use vim just to change stuff really fast when I'm in a terminal in X (because Emacs would bring up the GUI. I could get around that by running "DISPLAY= emacs" (is there another/better way?), but I don't have a problem with using vim.), that's it.
Logged
"What you share with the world is what it keeps of you."
 - Noah And The Whale: Give a little love



a poem by my computer, Macintosh Vigilante
Macintosh amends a damned around the requested typewriter. Macintosh urges a scarce design. Macintosh postulates an autobiography. Macintosh tolls the solo variant. Why does a winter audience delay macintosh? The maker tosses macintosh. Beneath female suffers a double scum. How will a rat cube the heavier cricket? Macintosh calls a method. Can macintosh nest opposite the headache? Macintosh ties the wrong fairy. When can macintosh stem the land gang? Female aborts underneath macintosh. Inside macintosh waffles female. Next to macintosh worries a well.

WMD

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,525
  • Kudos: 391
    • http://www.dognoodle99.cjb.net
Re: Emacs, or Vim?
« Reply #2 on: 16 December 2005, 02:27 »
At a big forum, this poll would be just asking for trouble. :p

I don't program so I'm fine with editors such as TextEdit and GEdit.  However, I'd use Vim over Emacs most of the time.  The only time I use Emacs is for the Psychaiatrist feature. ;)
Logged
My BSOD gallery
"Yes there's nothing wrong with going around being rude and selfish, killing people and fucking married women, but being childish is a cardinal sin around these parts." -Aloone_Jonez

skyman8081

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 910
  • Kudos: 187
    • http://sauron.game-host.org/
Re: Emacs, or Vim?
« Reply #3 on: 16 December 2005, 02:48 »
Nano/pico.

I like simplicity and intuitiveness.
Logged
2 motherfuckers have sigged me so far.  Fuck yeah!

Aloone_Jonez

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,090
  • Kudos: 954
Re: Emacs, or Vim?
« Reply #4 on: 16 December 2005, 03:06 »
Notepad 2 & Emacs
Logged
This is not a Windows help forum, however please do feel free to sign up and agree or disagree with our views on Microsoft.

Oh and FUCKMicrosoft! :fu:

MarathoN

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 405
  • Kudos: 168
Re: Emacs, or Vim?
« Reply #5 on: 16 December 2005, 10:39 »
I have to say Vim, best command line tool I have used so far. ;)
Logged

Calum

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,812
  • Kudos: 1000
    • Calum Carlyle's music
Re: Emacs, or Vim?
« Reply #6 on: 16 December 2005, 14:38 »
clearly vim, or some type of vi

the reason i say this is you know it will be installed. if i log into a shell account, it's not likely to have emacs on it, but you know vi will be there.

i used to be a real emacs advocate but i have to say for a text editor, vim edits text. it's a steep curve to start with, but so is emacs.

having said that, for beginners, pico and nano are great and so is jmacs and jpico
Logged
visit these websites and make yourself happy forever:
It's my music! | My music on MySpace | Integrational Polytheism

solemnwarning

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 747
  • Kudos: 338
    • http://www.solemnwarning.net
Re: Emacs, or Vim?
« Reply #7 on: 16 December 2005, 15:37 »
Kwrite\Kdevelop and nano
Logged
-----BEGIN GEEK CODE BLOCK-----
 Version: 3.1
 GCS/CM d- s+:+ a--- C++ UL++++>$ P+ L+++ !E W++ !N !o !K-- w !O !M !V PS+ PE- !Y !PGP !t !5 !X !R tv b+ DI+ !D G e- h !r y-
 ------END GEEK CODE BLOCK------

worker201

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,810
  • Kudos: 703
    • http://www.triple-bypass.net
Re: Emacs, or Vim?
« Reply #8 on: 16 December 2005, 23:08 »
vi*

just because that's what know.  To be perfectly honest, I don't think I've ever used any other command-line text editor.

As far as non-commandline stuff, I like gedit, it works for me.
Logged

Refalm

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 5,183
  • Kudos: 704
  • Sjembek!
    • RADIOKNOP
Re: Emacs, or Vim?
« Reply #9 on: 18 December 2005, 15:10 »
I actually use nano in console and vim in X for editing HTML or CSS.
Logged

mobrien_12

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,138
  • Kudos: 711
    • http://www.geocities.com/mobrien_12
Re: Emacs, or Vim?
« Reply #10 on: 18 December 2005, 19:42 »
Emacs.  Pico/nano are close   seconds... but using vi/vim is just a very frustrating experience for me and always has been.
Logged
In brightest day, in darkest night, no evil shall escape my sight....

Calum

  • Global Moderator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 7,812
  • Kudos: 1000
    • Calum Carlyle's music
Re: Emacs, or Vim?
« Reply #11 on: 18 December 2005, 22:10 »
actually (and i know this is pedantic) but vi isn't a command line text editor. ed is a command line text editor, however vi is a text based graphical text editor.

i know it's really pedantic but somehow i couldn't stop myself from mentioning it!
Logged
visit these websites and make yourself happy forever:
It's my music! | My music on MySpace | Integrational Polytheism

Aloone_Jonez

  • Administrator
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 4,090
  • Kudos: 954
Re: Emacs, or Vim?
« Reply #12 on: 18 December 2005, 22:19 »
Like edlin which isn't included in MS-DOS 5 to Windows ME but it was re-introduced in Windows 2000 and XP for some reason. :D
Logged
This is not a Windows help forum, however please do feel free to sign up and agree or disagree with our views on Microsoft.

Oh and FUCKMicrosoft! :fu:

toadlife

  • Member
  • **
  • Posts: 730
  • Kudos: 376
    • http://toadlife.net
Re: Emacs, or Vim?
« Reply #13 on: 19 December 2005, 01:28 »
vi is okay once you get the hang of the basics, but sometimes when I'm doing something really simple, I like the unix "edit", which is simlar to DOS "edit".
Logged
:)

hm_murdock

  • VIP
  • Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 2,629
  • Kudos: 378
  • The Lord of Thyme
Re: Emacs, or Vim?
« Reply #14 on: 19 December 2005, 02:56 »
Aloone, Edlin was always part of Windows NT.
Logged
Go the fuck ~
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
« previous next »